Home
Learn More About CoH
Visit CoH Library
Explore CoH Communities
Contribute to CoH Blog
Get Involved

Archive for February, 2009

Making health policy healthy

Friday, February 13th, 2009

As the stimulus bill moves through Congress, the pundits stay divided on whether the plan is too bloated or too thin to make a difference. Meanwhile, the national dialogue on health (care) is suffering malnourishment of another kind.

 

Yes, we need to expand access, increase efficiency and deliver consistent, quality medical care. But what’s causing people to need care in the first place? While healthy lifestyles, genetics, and medical care will always be important, research tells us that community forces – the social and environmental context in which we live and work – account for more than half of what makes us healthy or sick.

 

As Harvard sociologist David Williams points out in the documentary series, Unnatural Causes: “Housing policy is health policy. Educational policy is health policy. Anti-violence policy is health policy. Neighborhood improvement policies are health policies. Everything that we can do to improve the quality of life of individuals in our society has an impact on their health and is a health policy.”

 

So, will all this land on the desk of the soon-to-be-(re)named Health and Human Services secretary? Or, perhaps this order of change must be grown locally.

 

A good example is happening in Las Vegas. In collaboration with Communities of Health, members of the Nevada Alliance to Eliminate Health Disparities (NAEHD) gathered in a Policy Forum in December, and outlined four broad focus areas to support a new vision for a healthy Las Vegas:

1.   safe neighborhoods that allow for an active, vibrant community;

2.   effective education as a vehicle for economic opportunity;

3.   fair access to existing health care systems; and

4.   economic development and zoning of neighborhoods.

 

NAEHD is working to refine these areas into short-term, medium and long-term actions to influence policy change at the state and local levels, and to engage broader participation in creating community-driven solutions.

 

In addition to generating tangible action, engaged local participation like this creates “control of destiny” that is essential to health. And so perhaps the most powerful, health-giving policy is one that supports an ongoing participative process that allows people to come together in ways that are mutually supportive and empowering – because support and empowerment are fundamental determinants of health.

Call for Evidence

Monday, February 9th, 2009

Today Nissan announced it will be cutting 20,000 jobs. This on the heels of the January job report (another almost 600,000 jobs lost). Is anyone tracking the impact to health from these job losses — both directly (on those who are now unemployed) and indirectly (on those who can see the handwriting on the walls weeks or months before the pink slips are handed out)? Also of interest would be to know the impact of the cratering job market on those connected (both/either by bridge or bond) to the soon-to-be or already unemployed.

Admittedly, the correlation between employment prospects and health is a complex pathway. And the all-in cost of an FTE far exceeds the cost of that individual’s poor health (in all but the rarest of cases). Nevertheless, as the national dialog on health care and its unsustainable cost heats up and we devise means for controlling that cost it would be good to know as much about why we’re paying so much as we can.  Today most of what we hear about that has to do with inefficiencies in the system, advances in medical technology, malpractice insurance and the rising number of uninsured (itself partially a function of falling employment rates). It might make sense to include in this discussion the fact that as a people we are sicker than we could be and suggest some of the big reasons this might be so.

Beware nostalgia

Monday, February 9th, 2009

So much crisis response (see thinking on the financial crisis, the health care crisis, the education crisis, etc.) has an implicit return-to-the-way-things-were-before-they-fell-apart feel to them. This ignores the possibility that the seeds of the emergency at hand (be it financial, health care, education, what all) may have been sewn in the way things used to be.